Call Us
+86 136 6007 9809
Aug. 11, 2026
BSPP, BSPT, NPT and NPTF may all appear on drawings for fluid-handling and industrial equipment, but they are not interchangeable thread systems.
Selecting the wrong thread can create more than an assembly problem. It can change:
Thread engagement
Sealing interface
Installation depth
Port compatibility
Inspection method
Serviceability
Leakage risk
For OEM design engineers and procurement teams, the first question should therefore not be:
"What pipe thread looks closest?"
It should be:
"Which thread standard, thread form, mating component and sealing interface does the assembly require?"
This distinction is especially important for hydraulic equipment, pneumatic systems, pumps, valves, HVAC equipment, industrial machinery,
fluid-control equipment and custom CNC-machined components.
The core engineering rule is:
Same nominal pipe size ≠ same thread geometry.
And:
Thread compatibility ≠ sealing qualification.
This guide compares BSPP, BSPT, NPT and NPTF from both engineering and sourcing perspectives and explains what
JUXIN FASTENERS requires to evaluate drawing-based threaded components.

BSP and NPT are different pipe-thread families.
BSP thread forms are based on a 55° Whitworth profile.
NPT uses a 60° thread form defined by the applicable ASME pipe-thread standard.
Depending on the BSP thread type, the thread may be parallel or tapered.
NPT is tapered.
The systems can also differ in:
Thread angle
Thread form
Pitch / threads per inch for particular nominal sizes
Tapered versus parallel geometry
Diameter relationships
Gauge requirements
Mating-thread design
Sealing method
Therefore:
BSP and NPT should not be treated as interchangeable merely because a male thread can begin to engage a female thread.
Partial engagement does not prove dimensional compatibility or sealing performance.
| Thread System | Common Designation | Thread Form | Parallel / Tapered | Primary Reference | Sealing Principle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSPP | G | 55° | Parallel | ISO 228-1 | Separate sealing interface normally required |
| BSPT / ISO pipe thread for pressure-tight joints | R / Rc / Rp | 55° | R and Rc tapered; Rp parallel | ISO 7-1 / EN 10226 series where applicable | Thread system intended for pressure-tight joints, typically with suitable sealing practice |
| NPT | NPT | 60° | Tapered | ASME B1.20.1 | Tapered threaded joint, normally used with suitable sealing compound or tape as specified |
| NPTF | NPTF | 60° | Tapered | ASME B1.20.3 | Dryseal thread form designed for sealing through controlled thread interference |
This table is a starting point.
A correct connection still depends on the exact size, component geometry, mating port, sealing system, material, pressure, temperature and application specification.
Pipe threads are threaded interfaces used on components such as:
Ports
Fittings
Valves
Adapters
Plugs
Sensors
Manifolds
Pneumatic components
Hydraulic components
Fluid-control components
Custom machined connectors
Unlike an ordinary machine screw thread, a pipe-threaded connection may participate directly in the sealing architecture of the system.
That does not mean every pipe thread seals through the threads themselves.
Some systems use tapered threads as part of the pressure-tight joint.
Others use parallel threads primarily for mechanical engagement while sealing occurs at:
An O-ring
Bonded seal
Gasket
Washer
Cone
Face
Shoulder
Other engineered sealing surface
This leads to one of the most important rules in pipe-thread selection:
Thread type ≠ sealing method.
The drawing must define both when sealing performance matters.
"BSP" is commonly used as an umbrella term for British Standard Pipe thread forms.
For engineering work, that description is often too broad.
The two categories most commonly encountered are:
BSPP / G parallel threads
BSPT-related R, Rc and Rp pipe threads
They use a 55° Whitworth-derived thread form, but their geometry and sealing function are not identical.
An RFQ that says only:
"1/4 BSP"
can therefore be ambiguous.
The supplier may still need to know whether the requirement is:
G
R
Rc
Rp
Male or female
Parallel or tapered
Specific sealing interface
For drawing-based OEM sourcing, the exact designation should be stated.
BSPP is commonly used to describe parallel pipe threads standardized under ISO 228-1.
The designation typically uses the letter:
G
Examples may be written in a drawing using the applicable G thread designation and tolerance information required by the standard or application.
The important characteristic is:
The thread is parallel.
Unlike a tapered pipe thread, the G thread itself should not automatically be treated as the pressure seal.
The sealing interface is commonly provided elsewhere in the assembly.
Depending on the fitting design, this may include:
O-ring
Bonded seal
Flat gasket
Sealing washer
Face seal
Shoulder seal
Therefore:
G thread engagement ≠ completed pressure seal.
The complete fitting geometry determines how the joint seals.
A parallel threaded connection with a separate seal can provide useful design advantages in applications requiring controlled positioning or repeated servicing.
Depending on the fitting architecture, engineers can separate two functions:
Thread → Mechanical Retention
Seal → Fluid Containment
This can make the sealing interface easier to define and inspect than relying only on tapered thread interference.
However, performance still depends on:
Seal material
Seal geometry
Surface finish
Mating face
Installation load
Temperature
Fluid compatibility
Pressure
Repeated assembly conditions
A correct G thread alone does not qualify the complete connection.
Tapered BSP-type pipe threads used for pressure-tight joints are commonly specified through ISO 7-1 and related regional standards such as the EN 10226 series where applicable.
Important designations include:
External tapered pipe thread.
Internal tapered pipe thread.
Internal parallel pipe thread intended for use within the ISO 7-1 pressure-tight joint system.
Common mating arrangements may include:
R male × Rc female
or
R male × Rp female
depending on the specified connection.
These designations should not be replaced by the vague word "BSP" on an engineering drawing when the exact interface matters.
This is an important distinction that is frequently lost in simplified online BSP charts.
Both G and Rp are parallel internal thread concepts, but they belong to different standards and functional systems.
G threads are associated with ISO 228-1, where pressure-tight joints are not made on the threads alone.
Rp belongs to the ISO 7-1 system for pipe threads where pressure-tight joints are made on the threads.
Therefore:
Parallel thread ≠ automatically BSPP G.
The standard designation and intended mating system must be identified.
This is exactly why copying only diameter and threads-per-inch from an old part can create sourcing errors.
NPT means National Pipe Taper.
NPT threads are standardized under ASME B1.20.1 and are widely encountered in North American industrial equipment.
NPT uses a:
60° thread form
and a tapered geometry.
NPT connections are commonly used in:
Pumps
Valves
Pneumatic equipment
Industrial machinery
Process equipment
Fluid-control systems
Construction equipment
Instrumentation
General piping systems
A suitable thread-sealing material is commonly used where required by the application.
Possible sealing materials include application-compatible:
Pipe thread sealant
PTFE tape
Anaerobic thread sealant
But sealant selection should not be treated as universal.
Compatibility must consider:
Fluid
Temperature
Pressure
Component material
Contamination sensitivity
Manufacturer instructions
Applicable safety requirements
A common field assumption is that an NPT connection is acceptable when it becomes mechanically tight.
That is not enough.
A tapered thread can feel tight while still having problems caused by:
Incorrect thread form
Wrong nominal size
Damaged crest or root
Incorrect taper
Poor thread truncation
Inadequate engagement
Surface defects
Incorrect sealant
Mismatched mating port
Excessive or insufficient installation
Therefore:
Installation resistance ≠ sealing validation.
For critical applications, the connection must be evaluated against the actual drawing,
standard, assembly procedure and required leakage or pressure criteria.

NPTF means National Pipe Taper Fuel and is standardized under ASME B1.20.3.
It belongs to the Dryseal pipe-thread family.
NPTF uses a 60° tapered thread form but has controlled geometry intended to produce interference at the thread crest and root as well as the flanks when properly manufactured and assembled.
This is intended to minimize spiral leakage paths through the threaded interface.
That is why NPTF is commonly called a Dryseal thread.
However, the phrase "Dryseal" should not be interpreted as:
Every NPTF connection is automatically leak-free without validation.
Performance still depends on:
Male thread accuracy
Female thread accuracy
Gauge compliance
Material
Surface condition
Assembly
Reuse
Pressure
Temperature
Fluid
Application requirements
NPT and NPTF are related tapered pipe-thread systems, but they should not be treated as identical specifications.
The Dryseal system controls thread geometry differently to achieve its intended sealing behavior.
This matters for:
Manufacturing
Inspection
Gauging
Assembly
Sealing performance
A supplier should manufacture and inspect the thread according to the exact thread designation shown on the drawing.
Do not convert NPT to NPTF—or NPTF to NPT—without engineering review.
Similar thread designation ≠ functional equivalence.
Another common misconception is:
NPTF is a higher-pressure version of NPT.
That is not a sufficient engineering description.
Pressure capability depends on the complete connection, including:
Component material
Wall thickness
Port geometry
Thread engagement
Manufacturing quality
Seal design
Fluid
Temperature
Pressure cycling
External loads
Applicable component standard
Thread designation alone does not establish a universal pressure rating.
Therefore:
Pipe thread standard ≠ pressure rating.
The most visible difference is the thread angle:
BSP: 55°
NPT: 60°
But the incompatibility goes beyond angle.
Depending on size, the systems can also differ in:
Pitch
Thread profile
Major diameter
Minor diameter
Pitch diameter
Crest/root geometry
Taper definition
Gauge system
At some nominal sizes, threads may appear close enough that partial engagement is physically possible.
That does not make the connection correct.
Forcing mismatched BSP and NPT components together can result in:
Limited engagement
Local thread deformation
Damaged threads
Unpredictable installation depth
Leakage
Reduced serviceability
Therefore:
Can be screwed together ≠ interchangeable.
| Feature | BSPP / BSPT Family | NPT |
|---|---|---|
| Thread angle | 55° | 60° |
| Thread form | Whitworth-derived | ASME pipe thread form |
| Parallel version | G under ISO 228-1; Rp within ISO 7-1 system | Standard NPT is tapered |
| Tapered version | R / Rc | NPT |
| Primary standards | ISO 228-1, ISO 7-1, EN 10226 series where applicable | ASME B1.20.1 |
| Sealing method | Depends on G vs. R/Rc/Rp connection architecture | Tapered threaded joint, typically with specified sealing practice |
| Direct interchangeability | No | No |
Do not select between these systems by regional popularity alone.
The controlling factor should be the actual mating component and OEM specification.
The phrase "metric pipe thread" can create unnecessary confusion.
ISO metric screw threads standardized through systems such as ISO 261 and ISO 965 are not automatically pipe threads.
A metric threaded fitting may use an ordinary metric thread for mechanical retention while sealing through:
O-ring
Gasket
Bonded washer
Cone
Face
Shoulder
Therefore, engineers should not assume:
Metric thread = metric version of NPT or BSPT.
If a fluid connection uses a metric thread, define the actual thread specification and sealing interface.

An M10×1.0 thread and a pipe thread can both appear on a fluid component, but their functions may be completely different.
A metric thread may simply hold a fitting against an O-ring sealing face.
A tapered pipe thread may participate directly in the sealing mechanism.
This distinction becomes critical when reverse engineering a fitting.
Do not identify a thread from outside diameter alone.
When no drawing is available, use a structured identification process.
Measure diameter at multiple axial positions.
A measurable diameter change may indicate taper, but proper inspection equipment should be used for final identification.
Use an appropriate thread-pitch gauge or measurement method.
For inch-based pipe threads, identify threads per inch.
Check whether the thread corresponds to a 55° or 60° profile.
Do not identify pipe size from outside diameter alone.
Nominal pipe size is not simply the measured major diameter.
The mating port can reveal whether the system expects:
Parallel male thread
Tapered male thread
Parallel female thread
Tapered female thread
O-ring
Gasket
Face seal
Confirm the thread against:
ISO 228-1
ISO 7-1
ASME B1.20.1
ASME B1.20.3
Other applicable customer standard
Final production acceptance should use the inspection method and gauges required by the applicable thread specification.
A caliper alone is not a complete pipe-thread inspection system.
Pipe thread nominal sizes do not directly correspond to a simple measured thread outside diameter.
This is a common reason buyers send inquiries such as:
"The outside diameter is approximately X mm, so we think it is a 1/2-inch thread."
That conclusion may be wrong.
A proper RFQ should identify the thread from:
Drawing
Thread designation
Applicable standard
Mating component
Verified sample
For second-source projects, sending both the original component and mating part can reduce identification risk.
A reliable fluid connection can be considered as:
Thread Geometry + Mating Port + Sealing Interface + Material + Surface Condition + Installation + Fluid + Pressure + Temperature
This explains why two correctly threaded parts can still leak.
The problem may not be the thread.
Potential causes include:
Damaged O-ring
Incorrect gasket
Poor sealing-face finish
Contaminated sealing surface
Wrong sealant
Excessive assembly
Insufficient assembly
Port damage
Material incompatibility
Temperature-related seal degradation
Therefore:
Correct thread ≠ leak-free assembly.
| Failure / Problem | Possible Cause | Engineering Check |
|---|---|---|
| Thread starts but quickly jams | BSP/NPT mismatch, pitch mismatch, damaged thread | Verify thread standard and pitch |
| Connection assembles but leaks | Wrong sealing method, damaged thread, seal or face | Inspect complete sealing architecture |
| Fitting installs too deeply | Thread geometry, taper or gauge condition incorrect | Verify thread specification and gauging |
| Fitting does not install deeply enough | Wrong thread, excessive coating, geometry error | Inspect thread and surface treatment |
| Repeated assembly causes leakage | Thread or seal damage, unsuitable reuse | Review service design |
| NPTF connection leaks | Manufacturing, gauging, material or assembly issue | Validate both mating threads and application |
| BSPP joint leaks | Seal interface problem rather than G thread alone | Inspect O-ring, washer, face or shoulder |
| Port cracks during installation | Excessive installation load or unsuitable component design | Review torque, geometry and material |
| Coated thread becomes tight | Coating thickness changed effective thread condition | Review coating allowance and final gauging |
This diagnostic approach is more useful than assuming every fluid leak is caused by "bad threads."
Threaded fittings and custom machined components may require surface treatments such as:
Zinc plating
Zinc-nickel coating
Black finishes
Passivation for stainless steel
Other customer-specified finishes
Coating thickness can affect final thread geometry.
This is especially important for precision internal and external threads.
The engineering sequence should be:
Machined Thread → Surface Treatment → Final Thread Condition → Gauging → Assembly Validation
A thread that is correct before coating may not remain correct after an uncontrolled coating build.
Therefore:
Pre-coating thread compliance ≠ finished-component thread compliance.
Pipe-threaded components can be produced from materials such as:
Carbon steel
Stainless steel
Aluminum
Brass or other application-specific alloys where required
Material selection affects:
Strength
Corrosion
Galling
Thread deformation
Installation
Chemical compatibility
Galvanic interaction
For example, stainless steel may provide useful corrosion resistance but can introduce galling considerations in threaded assemblies.
Likewise:
Stainless steel ≠ universal fluid-system material.
Compatibility with the actual medium and service environment must be evaluated.
Hydraulic equipment may use several connection architectures.
The thread may provide:
Mechanical retention
Part of the sealing mechanism
Positioning for a separate seal
Engineers should not assume that specifying "hydraulic fitting" defines the thread or pressure rating.
A hydraulic component drawing should identify:
Thread
Port geometry
Sealing interface
Material
Pressure requirement
Surface treatment
Inspection requirement
For safety-critical hydraulic systems, component-level qualification and applicable industry requirements take priority.
Pneumatic systems commonly use threaded:
Fittings
Valves
Cylinders
Manifolds
Regulators
Filters
Sensors
A small air leak may reduce efficiency, affect control stability or increase compressor demand.
Thread selection should therefore consider:
Port standard
Sealing method
Assembly process
Maintenance
Vibration
Repeated service
For global OEM equipment, standardizing port interfaces can also reduce field-service errors.
HVAC equipment may include threaded connections in:
Pumps
Valves
Water circuits
Air systems
Sensors
Drain components
Auxiliary equipment
Thread choice should be based on the equipment specification and mating components.
Pressure, temperature, fluid, sealing material and maintenance conditions must be evaluated as a system.

Industrial machinery frequently combines components sourced from different international supply chains.
One machine may contain:
European G ports
ISO 7-1 threaded connections
North American NPT components
Metric mechanical threads
This creates a significant procurement risk when replacement parts are ordered only by nominal size.
For international OEM equipment:
Thread standard should be part of the controlled BOM and drawing—not tribal knowledge held by maintenance staff.
Pipe-threaded or fluid-port components may appear in selected vehicle and transportation equipment.
However, thread standard alone does not establish suitability for:
Brake systems
Fuel systems
High-pressure systems
Safety-critical hydraulic systems
EV thermal-management systems
These applications can require OEM-specific component and system validation.
Therefore:
Correct NPT, NPTF or BSP thread ≠ automotive safety qualification.
Use this sequence before releasing a drawing.
What exact thread does the mating component use?
Is the thread:
Mechanical retention only?
Part of the pressure seal?
Used with a separate sealing interface?
Examples include:
ISO 228-1
ISO 7-1
EN 10226 series where applicable
ASME B1.20.1
ASME B1.20.3
Specify:
Thread sealant
PTFE tape where permitted
O-ring
Bonded seal
Gasket
Face seal
Other controlled sealing method
Provide:
Pressure
Temperature
Fluid
Vibration
Pressure cycling
Maintenance requirements
Consider:
Corrosion
Chemical compatibility
Galling
Coating thickness
Thread fit
Specify the applicable gauge and acceptance requirements.
This sequence prevents the thread designation from being isolated from the actual system design.
Instead of:
"Need 1/4 BSP fitting, 10,000 pcs."
a technically useful RFQ should include:
Exact thread designation
Male or female
Parallel or tapered
Applicable standard
Drawing revision
Mating component
Sealing method
Material
Surface treatment
Pressure requirement
Temperature
Fluid or medium
Critical dimensions
Inspection requirements
Annual volume
This allows suppliers to quote the same component rather than different interpretations of the same description.
A second source should not be approved because:
The thread screws into the old fitting
The outside diameter looks correct
The sample does not leak during one manual test
Functional equivalence should compare:
Drawing + Revision + Thread Standard + Thread Designation + Taper / Parallel Geometry + Pitch + Thread Form
+ Gauge Requirement + Material + Mechanical Properties + Surface Treatment + Sealing Interface + Critical Dimensions
+ Installation Behavior + Pressure / Leak Requirement + Functional Testing + Documentation + Change Control
Remember:
Same nominal size ≠ same thread.
Thread engagement ≠ functional equivalence.
One successful assembly ≠ production qualification.
Procurement and supplier-development teams should ask:
Which pipe-thread standards can be manufactured?
How is the thread inspected?
Which gauges are required?
Is final gauging performed after surface treatment where applicable?
How is taper controlled?
How are sealing surfaces inspected?
How are critical dimensions controlled?
What material specification applies?
What surface treatment applies?
What functional tests are required by the drawing?
How are drawing revisions controlled?
How are manufacturing-process changes controlled?
The exact qualification depth should reflect the risk of the application.
For pipe-threaded components, unit price is only one sourcing variable.
A thread mismatch or sealing problem can cause:
Rework
Scrap
Line stoppage
Field leakage
Maintenance
Emergency replacement
Equipment downtime
Warranty exposure
A more useful commercial model is:
Total Installed Cost = Part Price + Installation + Tooling + Inspection + Rework + Scrap + Downtime + Logistics + Maintenance + Warranty Risk + Supply Risk
For high-volume OEM programs, preventing one ambiguous thread specification can be worth far more than a small reduction in unit price.

JUXIN FASTENERS supports drawing-based threaded components and precision fastener requirements for industrial OEM applications.
Relevant capabilities can include:
BSPP / G threaded components
BSPT-related R, Rc and Rp threaded components
NPT threaded components
NPTF threaded components
Metric threaded components
Custom threaded fasteners
Threaded plugs
Custom adapters
Precision CNC machined components
Cold-formed fasteners with secondary machining
Stainless steel threaded components
Carbon steel threaded components
Aluminum threaded components
Custom OEM fastening components
Drawing-based second-source development
JUXIN FASTENERS should be evaluated against the specific drawing and application requirements for each project.
For fluid-handling components, pressure or sealing capability should never be assumed solely from the thread designation.
No. They use different thread forms and can also differ in pitch, diameter relationships and taper geometry. Partial engagement does not establish compatibility.
BSPP commonly refers to G parallel threads under ISO 228-1. BSPT-related pressure-tight thread systems use R, Rc and Rp designations under ISO 7-1 and related standards.
G is the standard designation commonly associated with parallel pipe threads under ISO 228-1.
The term BSPT is commonly associated with tapered pipe threads, but the ISO 7-1 system includes R tapered external,
Rc tapered internal and Rp parallel internal threads. The exact designation should therefore be used.
No. Both are parallel thread designations, but they belong to different standards and pressure-tight joint concepts.
Both are 60° tapered pipe-thread systems, but NPTF Dryseal controls the thread geometry differently for its intended sealing mechanism.
Manufacture and inspection should follow the specified standard.
NPTF is designed as a Dryseal thread system, but application sealing performance still depends on manufacturing accuracy,
mating components, material, assembly and service conditions. Follow the component and system specification.
Not reliably. Measure pitch, taper, thread form and relevant diameters and compare them with the applicable standard.
No. Nominal pipe size should not be interpreted as a direct measurement of the thread outside diameter.
Yes. Leakage can result from the sealing interface, assembly, surface damage, sealant, O-ring, gasket,
material or service conditions even when the thread itself is dimensionally correct.
Provide a drawing showing the exact thread designation and standard, material, dimensions, surface treatment,
sealing interface, application, quantity and required inspection or functional testing.
A sample can support identification and second-source development, but a controlled drawing is preferable because a sample cannot communicate all tolerances,
material requirements, inspection criteria or revision history.
The nominal size alone does not define thread form, angle, pitch, taper, diameter relationships or sealing architecture.
No. Where possible, specify the exact G, R, Rc or Rp thread designation and applicable standard.
JUXIN FASTENERS can evaluate drawing-based BSPP, BSPT-related, NPT, NPTF, metric and other custom threaded components according to the required material,
geometry, surface treatment, inspection and application requirements.
For technical and commercial evaluation, provide:
2D drawing
3D model if available
Part number
Drawing revision
Application
Thread designation
BSPP / G, R, Rc, Rp, NPT or NPTF
Applicable thread standard
Male or female thread
Parallel or tapered thread
Nominal size
Thread pitch / TPI where applicable
Required thread class or tolerance where applicable
Gauge requirement
Mating component drawing if available
Sealing method
Sealing-face geometry
O-ring or gasket specification where applicable
Material
Material grade
Heat treatment where applicable
Surface treatment
Coating thickness where applicable
Final thread-gauge requirement after coating
Operating pressure
Test pressure if specified
Leakage acceptance criteria if specified
Operating temperature
Fluid or gas
Chemical compatibility requirements
Vibration or pressure-cycling conditions
Critical dimensions
Surface-finish requirements on sealing surfaces
Functional testing requirements
Required inspection documentation
PPAP or customer-specific documentation where applicable
Annual volume
Existing sample for second-source development where available
If the existing thread is unknown, provide both the component and mating part where possible rather than estimating the thread from outside diameter.
This page should connect internally with existing JUXIN FASTENERS resources covering:
Custom CNC machined fasteners
Custom threaded components
Thread tolerance and fit
Stainless steel fastener selection
Aluminum fastener and threaded-component design
Zinc plating and surface finish selection
Zinc-nickel coated fasteners
PTFE coated fasteners
Hydraulic and pneumatic equipment fastening solutions
HVAC fastening solutions
Industrial equipment fastening solutions
Second-source fastener qualification
Drawing-based OEM fasteners
Use the existing indexed JUXIN FASTENERS URL when implementing each internal link.
The intended content path is:
Pipe Thread Identification → BSP / NPT Selection → Sealing Interface → Material & Surface Finish → Manufacturing & Inspection → Second-Source Qualification → RFQ
The most important lesson in BSP and NPT selection is that the thread cannot be separated from the connection.
A reliable specification should follow:
Thread Standard → Exact Designation → Male / Female → Parallel / Tapered → Mating Component → Sealing Method
→ Material → Surface Treatment → Pressure & Temperature → Inspection → Functional Validation
For engineers, this reduces leakage and assembly risk.
For procurement teams, it prevents suppliers from quoting different interpretations of an ambiguous pipe-thread description.
For supplier-development teams, it provides a controlled basis for second-source qualification.
BSPP, BSPT, NPT and NPTF are established engineering systems with different geometries and sealing concepts.
None should be substituted simply because nominal sizes appear similar.
JUXIN FASTENERS supports OEM, Tier-1, Tier-2 and industrial manufacturers with drawing-based custom threaded components,
BSPP and BSPT-related threads, NPT and NPTF threaded parts, metric threaded components, precision CNC machined parts,
custom cold-formed fasteners with secondary operations, and second-source development.
For a new threaded component, legacy-part replacement, thread-identification project or alternative-source qualification,
send your drawing, revision, mating component information, material, surface treatment, sealing requirements, service conditions and annual volume for technical review.
JUXIN FASTENERS
Email: info@juxinfasteners.com
Website: www.juxinfasteners.com

Contact Us
Tel.:
+86 020 8621 0320
+86 020 3121 6067
E-mail:
Technical Support:
Navigation
SEND INQUIREY